Monday, December 20, 2010

i dont remember i heard this but apperently in europe, survival of the fittest isnt a problem over there but here in america it is. could it be that americans are just lazy and just wait for pros to do something amazing,take the idea and run with it, and never try new ideas purely becuase we are lazy? survival didnt even make it to the finals of worlds and was still banned. and somehow wiuth all the cards in the history of magic, nobody could come up with a deck that could beat that deck? i dont understand that at all.
i am not trying to bash legacy players at all. i am a rouge builder for standard realizing that i need a tier deck to do well not a legacy deck builder...not yet anyways, theres tons of potential in legacy and i know a lot of cards in magic. i have been playing since masquesso i have seen a ton of things in this game. i feel like banning survival is an ok thing,but its going to stop the process of people building different decks and going back to gobs, merfolk and countertop.
i wish i had more to say about legac but until i dive right in i only have an outsiders opinion. but that might chnge this year, so who knows

No comments:

Post a Comment